< return to the brandensite

running commentary

The internet is filled with things. Here are some of them.

#math

2025

Scifi author Greg Egan and anonymous 4chan shitpost solve a longstanding math problem 2025 Mar 7
Quoting liberally from the Scientific American article which summarizes this:
The first season of [The Melancholy of Haruhi Suzumiya] consists of 14 episodes that were designed so that you can watch them in any order you like. At some point in a 2011 discussion of the series on 4chan, someone asked the minimum number of episodes they would have to watch to have seen it in every possible order. In fact, this question is related to so-called superpermutations. And as it turns out, this mathematical area holds many puzzles: to this day, mathematicians are still unable to fully answer the problem that the 4chan user had posed.
The exact answer may be (at this time) unknowable, but in that 4chan /sci/ discussion, an anonymous person provided a formula for determining the lower bound of what that number could be. According to mathematician Robin Houston, "the author of the proof is not (to the best of my knowledge) a mathematician, nor does he have any apparent desire to publish his result in a conventional form, so it's still a pretty unexpected place for such a result to originate." Houston put that together with a recent proof from scifi author Greg Egan who had coincidentally arrived at a similar formula for the number's upper bound, and provided the world with an answer:

Egan's upper bound formula: n! +(n – 1)! + (n – 2)! + (n – 3)! + n – 3

Anon's lower bound formula: n! +(n – 1)! + (n – 2)! + n – 3

So the math works out that to watch all 14 episodes of Haruhi in all possible orders, you'd need to watch a minimum of 93,884,313,611 episodes and a maximum of 93,924,230,411. "But with an average episode length of around 24 minutes, it would take about 4 million years to sit through this superpermutation."
Most numbers are unimaginable 2025 Feb 19
When I think too hard about math it makes my brain hurt. Which is why I don't think too hard about math. This person named Ben Orlin on this blog called Math with Bad Drawings posts in 2016 while thinking too hard about math, and considers how many of the numbers in the existence of numbers (if numbers even exist at all) "cannot be touched by the human mind" and that "this is most numbers" ... oww brain hurty.
If you pick a random number between 0 and 1, you will arrive at a number that literally cannot be communicated or expressed. Sure, you can list the decimal digits, but if you ever stop, even after a trillion years, then you will have failed to specify your number – and there is no process by which you can tell a computer to carry on the job.
This is best summarized by the comment on the post from mr sock monkey who says:
monkey still not sure of definition of word number or if number have existence independent of human mind. when monkey read definition of number by mr russell it make simple brain of monkey spin.